Benefit-Risk Assessment Methods in Medical Product Development
Bridging Qualitative and Quantitative Assessments
Bog
1.017,50 kr.
915,75 kr.
Printed on demand. Please note: expected time of delivery can be longer than usual, 3-5 weeks.

Produkt beskrivelse

Guides You on the Development and Implementation of Bâ¤"R Evaluations Benefitâ¤"Risk Assessment Methods in Medical Product Development: Bridging Qualitative and Quantitative Assessments provides general guidance and case studies to aid practitioners in selecting specific benefitâ¤"risk (Bâ¤"R) frameworks and quantitative methods. Leading experts from industry, regulatory agencies, and academia present practical examples, lessons learned, and best practices that illustrate how to conduct structured Bâ¤"R assessment in clinical development and regulatory submission. The first section of the book discusses the role of Bâ¤"R assessments in medicine development and regulation, the need for both a common Bâ¤"R framework and patient input into Bâ¤"R decisions, and future directions. The second section focuses on legislative and regulatory policy initiatives as well as decisions made at the U.S. FDAâ¤s Center for Devices and Radiological Health. The third section examines key elements of Bâ¤"R evaluations in a productâ¤s life cycle, such as uncertainty evaluation and quantification, quantifying patient Bâ¤"R trade-off preferences, ways to identify subgroups with the best Bâ¤"R profiles, and data sources used to assist Bâ¤"R assessment. The fourth section equips practitioners with tools to conduct Bâ¤"R evaluations, including assessment methodologies, a quantitative joint modeling and joint evaluation framework, and several visualization tools. The final section presents a rich collection of case studies. With top specialists sharing their in-depth knowledge, thought-provoking considerations, and practical advice, this book offers comprehensive coverage of Bâ¤"R evaluation methods, tools, and case studies. It gives practitioners a much-needed toolkit to develop and conduct their own Bâ¤"R evaluations.

Detaljer